Jump to content

User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 11:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 17:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pi bot

[edit]

Hi. It looks like Quality images candidates/statistics page hasn't been updated since 1st of March. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Екатерина Борисова: Thanks for the heads-up. That's weird, I just tried running the script locally and it works fine, let's see if Pi bot restarts updating it later today. I'm travelling at the moment, so I can't look directly at the bot logs... It might have been an unexpected data format in an archive or something, not sure. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick reply. I think it's not the badly urgent task, so I just wanted to let you know. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 17:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 17:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 084 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 085 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 089 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but I agree with Peulle regarding the file namings --Poco a poco 20:38, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 091 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:17, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]